<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validating Page Tags with HttpFox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/</link>
	<description>In the Beginner&#039;s Mind There Are Many Possibilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:51:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptymind.org/?p=822#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Habit really - although some of the DOM exploration/management is useful, as is some of the on-the-fly timing information.

 That said, this has reminded me to come back and use httpfox more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Habit really &#8211; although some of the DOM exploration/management is useful, as is some of the on-the-fly timing information.</p>
<p> That said, this has reminded me to come back and use httpfox more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptymind.org/?p=822#comment-986</guid>
		<description>I completely agree Rudi.  It really depends on the task you are trying to complete, there is not sense in using a hammer for every job when you have a toolbox readily available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree Rudi.  It really depends on the task you are trying to complete, there is not sense in using a hammer for every job when you have a toolbox readily available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi Shumpert</title>
		<link>http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi Shumpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptymind.org/?p=822#comment-985</guid>
		<description>I think you have to use multiple tools.  I use firebug for most web dev debugging, and there is an add on to firebug called omnibug which will show you some decent info as well as tracking that happens with ajax calls.

But... I use WASP, TamperData, HttpFox as well.  It just depends on the task at hand.

-Rudi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to use multiple tools.  I use firebug for most web dev debugging, and there is an add on to firebug called omnibug which will show you some decent info as well as tracking that happens with ajax calls.</p>
<p>But&#8230; I use WASP, TamperData, HttpFox as well.  It just depends on the task at hand.</p>
<p>-Rudi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptymind.org/?p=822#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Bob.  Can you share what you like best about using &#039;Firebug&#039; and &#039;Web Developer&#039;?  I find myself using both of those products as well but not for validating measurement page tags.  Interested in your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Bob.  Can you share what you like best about using &#8216;Firebug&#8217; and &#8216;Web Developer&#8217;?  I find myself using both of those products as well but not for validating measurement page tags.  Interested in your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://emptymind.org/validating-page-tags-with-httpfox/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emptymind.org/?p=822#comment-979</guid>
		<description>To take nothing away from HttpFox (which is awesome) I tend to use &#039;Firebug&#039; and &#039;Web Developer&#039; on a day-to-day basis (I mention only because you didn&#039;t)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To take nothing away from HttpFox (which is awesome) I tend to use &#8216;Firebug&#8217; and &#8216;Web Developer&#8217; on a day-to-day basis (I mention only because you didn&#8217;t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
